Bronevsky Vladimir Bogdanovic

(1784 - 1835), studied at the Marine Corps, took part in the Mediterranean campaign of 1805 - 1810 period, he served in the Black Sea Fleet, from 1819 to 1828, Mr.. was inspector Tula noble college, and from 1828 to 1832. Assistant Director of the Corps of Pages, a member of the Academy of Russia, Bronevsky participated in many periodicals (in the "well-intentioned", "Sorevnovatele Enlightenment", "News of Europe", "Son of the Fatherland", etc.), translated the novel in. Scott "Mannering (Moscow, 1824). He put forward the "Notes of a naval officer, in the course of the campaign in the Mediterranean, under the command of Vice Admiral D.N. Senyavin, from 1805 to 1810 "(four parts, St. Petersburg., 1818 - 1819 and the second edition. 1836 - 1837 years), after which Grech included it in its "Experience the history of Russian literature. Marly-Bestuzhev wrote about this book that Bronevsky "depicted as if in a panorama of the Mediterranean Sea. He drew attention to a variety of subjects, style flourishing, the swiftness of the story about water and land battles and the ardor with which gives us the heroic deeds of their enemies, friends and sons of Russia. He happily avoided the lack of many travelers, fatiguing details. It is entertaining to all and never dull ". Of the other works Bronevsky called: "Review the southern coast of Tauris in 1815" (Tula, . 1822; translated into German and Polish), "Letters of a naval officer, . employees in addition to the notes of a naval officer "(M., . 1825), "Journey from Trieste to St Petersburg in 1810" (M., . 1828), "History of the Don Cossacks, . description of the Don land and the Caucasian Mineral Waters "(St. Petersburg, . 1834),
. K "Stories of the Don troops" very harshly treated Belinsky (in the "rumor" in 1835), argued with Bronevsky as a historian, N.A. Field. By one of the last works was Bronevsky parsing "History of the Pugachev rebellion" Pushkin ( "Son of the Fatherland", 1835, January), captious and maloosnovatelny. Incidentally, . Bronevsky great artist accused of failing to understand the nature Pugacheva: "Emelka Pugachev undoubtedly belonged to the rare, . to the monsters outside the laws of nature is born, . For in its nature is not it and the slightest spark of good, . to good start, . the spiritual part, . that a reasonable creature from the wanton animals differ "..,
. Pushkin was not left without a detailed review Bronevsky objections ( "Contemporary", 1836, t. III), although acknowledged some minor comments of his fair, and refuted his allegations step by step, "political and moral reflection, koimi g. Bronevsky embellished his story - wrote Pushkin - weak and went and not reward readers for lack of evidence, accurate news and clarity to the incident ". - Biographical and bibliographical information about Bronevsky collected SA. Vengerov ( "Works Belinsky", II, 540 - 542, and "Sources of the dictionary of Russian writers", I). L.