Russia submitted to the UN security Council evidence of falsification himataki in the Duma
Russia at the meeting of the UN security Council brought confirmation of the falsification of the use of chemical weapons in the Syrian Duma in 2018.
the meeting of the security Council of the United Nations on the "Arria formula" is held in the first day of the week on the initiative of Russia and devoted to the discussion of the report of the OPCW on March 1, 2019 on the results of the investigation of the conflict in the city of Duma in Eastern ghouta, which occurred on 7 April 2018.
the meeting was supported by the Director of the Foundation studies democracy Maxim Grigoriev. He showed the Members of the security Council the testimony of the residents Council, and was told that Authorized his NGO was in the Syrian Arab Republic more than 10 times and interviewed hundreds of witnesses of different events.
according to his statement, the NGOs interviewed fifteen witnesses at a clinic in the Duma.
She read a number of transcripts of conversations with witnesses, which said, and among them that the hospital in the Duma did not have citizens, victims of chemical attacks.
The members of the security Council also showed a video of a former expert of the OPCW Mission Ian Henderson, who worked in the Duma.
"Were sent to two groups. To the first I joined shortly after She was deployed in the Duma, " said Henderson.
according to his statement, in the end, those who worked in the Duma, was removed from the final report.
The Russian side emphasizes that a critical Analysis of the report of the OPCW caused serious questions To the conclusions of the main evidence points of the investigation, whether the chemical Analysis, toxicology, ballistics, or the testimony of witnesses. For reviews of the capital of Russia, through 2019 appeared more and more evidence showing that the inspectors were part of the original group, deployed in the Duma, were not involved and did not participate in writing the report until its publication. In addition, as stressed by the Russian side, the numerous attempts of these people to raise reasonable questions or even to Express a different from the report observation many times ignored. This practice, according to the capital of Russia, casts doubt on the integrity of the final report.
Russia's permanent representative to the OPCW Alexander Shulgin, a speech at the meeting of the security Council, tried to persuade to line up briefing With the participation of all experts of the OPCW Mission to establish facts of using chemical weapons in the Syrian Arab Republic, who worked on the conflict in the Duma, " to find a consensus of opinion on considering the high-profile incident in the Syrian city ".
However, some countries at the meeting of the security Council continued to accuse Syria of using chemical weapons. For example the permanent representative of Estonia to the UN, Sven Jurgenson said that he trusted " independent and professional work of MOFS ". According to his statement, " there is no reason to doubt the conclusions of the report of the OPCW on the Duma ".
The UK's permanent representative to the UN Karen pierce also accused Syria of using chemical weapons. Messenger of the American Mission will Cherith Norman Chalet expressed the view that "Russia's trying to protect (Syrian President) Bashar al-Assad, that he is not held responsible" for the use of chemical weapons.
The OPCW 1 March 2019 issued a report on the results of the investigation of the conflict in the city of Duma in Eastern ghouta, which occurred on 7 April 2018, which stated that the attack used " a toxic chemical... Maybe chlorine ". In the document, for example, argues that the cylinders with chlorine were dropped from the air, which allowed small countries in the West blame the attack the Syrian air force.
Meanwhile, later shared got a document with the engineering experts of the OPCW Ian Henderson, which stated that " the observations made in 2 places of the event, together with subsequent analysis allow to predict that maybe the cylinders were placed, and not dropped from the air." The paper noted that the group of experts led by Henderson conducted a series of tests, simulating the situation. Experts came To the conclusion that the 1st of the alleged himataki traces of the intended impact of the capacity in which as if it were a toxic substance, do not coincide with damage to the concrete roof on the scene. Analysis of the 2-th place, where a container of gas found on the bed in the 1st of the premises, showed that the cylinder valve is left intact, which is impossible When passing through the ceiling of the ceiling.
before the West was subjected to charges of the Damascus chemical attack on the Syrian city of Duma in Eastern ghouta, and threatened with military strikes. As evidence of a chemical attack organization "White helmets" used footage depicting the inhabitants of the Duma, and among them children, whom the doctors as if trying to save from the effects of chemical toxic substances.
The Ministry of foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation said that the purpose of stuffing about the use of chemical poisonous substances of troops to Syria to protect the terrorists and to whitewash possible military strikes from outside. While the Russian General staff intimidated about the upcoming fighters in Eastern ghouta provocation staged the use of chemical weapons.
<span style="color:darkgray
|
