Arbatov called a logical step in making changes in military doctrine of the Russian Federation
Making changes in military doctrine of Russia is a logical step, because the relations between Russia And the West over the past four years has undergone significant changes, according to the academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences Alexei Arbatov.
Deputy Secretary of the security Council of the Russian Federation Mikhail Popov in an interview Last news said that the Russian Federation until the end of 2014 will take updated military doctrine in connection with the emergence of new threats to the country. In it, Russia will supply the task of import substitution. Popov explained that the specification of the military doctrine dictated foreign policy factors: NATO expansion, MISSILE defense issue AND the situation in Ukraine And around it. The current Military doctrine of the Russian Federation was adopted four years ago in 2010.
Military doctrine is a document which aims to send a signal And foreign countries, And the public And the political elite within the state. The previous doctrine was adopted in 2010, since then the situation very seriously changed significantly, And it is logical that the military doctrine of the changes were made, " said Arbatov Last news . The specialist was reminded that, despite the fact that the Military doctrine was adopted in a warming between Russia And the West after the Russian Federation And the United States signed a new Treaty on the reduction And limitation of strategic offensive arms, but then it at the forefront of military threats included NATO, the expansion of the Commonwealth, missile defense.
" We can say that the Military doctrine of anticipated future developments - she has put NATO among the main external threats to the Russian Federation, when relations were good, and since then they quickly deteriorated. Now NATO has taken the place which the doctrine of 2010 he was given, " he added Arbatov. According to him, the doctrine of the 2010 NATO is not directly mentioned, it said expanding borders of other military alliances to the Russian borders, the expansion of military alliances. Now that NATO And the US open will be announced in doctrine as the main danger, said the expert.
reviews Arbatov, for the Russian Federation to find analogues of imported products, raw materials And components in the field of armaments, but this will take time And be costly.
" To replace imported products used in military production, really, but it will be expensive. The story is not just about import substitution obtained from NATO countries, but also derived from the Ukraine, " Arbatov said. He said that Ukraine in the Russian Federation provides many products that are used in the production of military equipment, spare parts.
as examples Arbatov led helicopter engines Zaporozhye plant " Motor Sich ". In Dnepropetrovsk is rocket company Yuzhmash And design Bureau " southern ", which until now was carried out by the author and technical supervision for heavy strategic nuclear missiles out there who some time ago made - famous " Satan " or " Magistrates ", which focuses thirty percent of Russia's strategic nuclear potential." All these years Ukrainian Experts came periodically inspected these missiles, to give an opinion, how much more they have the opportunity to be in the roster, because they exceeded All deadlines (operation). And for example, gave advice on what repairs need to hold them to their further support. Under current conditions, it looks weird, it is necessary to refuse it. Perhaps we need to take them with weapons, because of their technical safeguards compliance will not be given, " added the expert.
Certain problems have the ability to occur with electronics." electronic engineering, computer items are mostly imported, indirectly imported through third countries will be hardest to replace. The expert believes that there can be now supplied electronics China is unlikely to succeed." China itself gets All the advanced countries of the West, And it is likely to be " lagging behind in terms of technology." The West is Chinese hard to put rules And prevent re-export. Yes And he does not want China to Russia competed with him in the forefront of technology, where He tries to compete with the West. Will have to raise the electronics themselves, " added the expert.
|
